What the hell is wrong with the Minneapolis Park Board?

I don’t understand the Minneapolis Park Board at all. First, read this press release. It describes how the Board has decided to spend $7.7 million on acquiring a former lumberyard on the Mississippi for conversion to a park. While I like the idea of expanding the park system, I found this to be a questionable use of funds because the Park Board, like nearly every other governmental entity in the state, has been operating under severe budget constraints for several years. Still, I was willing to give the Board the benefit of the doubt, and assume this really was too great an opportunity to pass up.

Until last week.

I was along with my daughter’s fourth grade field trip, taking a riverboat tour of the river when I learned exactly where this $7.7 million expansion was located.

Here’s a picture from Google Maps, with the new acquisition outlined in red:

Location of the Sherer Bros. Lumberyard

If you read the article linked above, you may remember the following passage:

“This acquisition is an important step in providing a legacy park for Northeast Minneapolis,” said John Erwin, president of the MPRB Board of Commissioners. “It provides a critical connection for public access to recreational activities along the River, and also provides a connection to the bike trail corridor to downtown Minneapolis.”

So this acquisition provides a great new park along the river for Northeast Minneapolis, something which apparently lacking.

Wait. What?

Boom Island park in relation to Sherer Bros.

Here’s a larger view, with the new acquisition outlined in red as before, but with the very large, and most significantly, riverside Boom Island Park, part of the Minneapolis Park System. Note that Boom Island Park and the newly purchased parkland are quite literally right across the street from each other.

Now supposedly there is a reason for this; it apparently fits in with the “Above the Falls Master Plan“, but given the disrepair in which much of the park system finds itself, that plan strikes me as more grandiose than visionary.

I really wish the Park Board would get a grip on reality.

Advertisements

2 comments

  1. I think the Park Board made the right decision. They’re attempting to create a continuous parkway with trails up and down both sides of the river over the length of the city, but still have a significant amount of land to acquire above the falls. As someone who lives blocks from W River Parkway near Lake Street, I have a pretty good feel for how much having publicly accessible trails improves a neighborhood.

    No, it’s not cheap, but the Park Board has decided to make it a priority to pick up land as it becomes available. As I understand it, this is the first time that land has been available in 30 years. Should a business purchase it and build on it, the chance of seeing it available again in our lifetimes would be fairly low.

    It’s not a new park as much as an extension of the parkway. For example, imagine if there was a large industrial business located on the river at W River Parkway and 36th St E. That would cut into the continuous parkway that runs from Minnehaha Falls to North of Broadway (followed by starting up again in N Minneapolis).

    It’s slow progress, but it’s executing on a plan that makes sense for the city.

  2. I think the purchase was a good idea for the park system – just that John Erwin maybe didn’t state things in the best possible fashion. That quote from the press release definitely made it seem like there wasn’t a park anywhere around. WTH Indeed!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s